Rick Sanchez on Jewish Media Power
October 3, 2010
How Jewish is
Hollywood? Thats the question Los Angeles Times columnist Joel Stein
asked two years ago just before Christmas. In answer, he wrote:
When the studio chiefs took out a full-page ad in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago to demand that the Screen Actors Guild settle its contract, the open letter was signed by: News Corp. President Peter Chernin (Jewish), Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Jewish), Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert Iger (Jewish), Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (surprise, Dutch Jew), Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer (Jewish), CBS Corp. Chief Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Jewish) and NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker (mega-Jewish). If either of the Weinstein brothers had signed, this group would have not only the power to shut down all film production but to form a minyan with enough Fiji water on hand to fill a mikvah.
guy, Joel Stein. But his point is important. To sum up, he wrote sarcastically, The
Jews are so dominant, I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high
positions at entertainment companies. When I called them to talk about their incredible
advancement, five of them refused to talk to me, apparently out of fear of insulting Jews.
The sixth, AMC President Charlie Collier, turned out to be Jewish.
Stein ended his column by saying, As a proud Jew, I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood. Without us, you'd be flipping between The 700 Club and Davey and Goliath on TV all day.
Needless to say, Stein was not fired for
writing this, nor was he rebuked in the least. As we have seen time and again, there is a
glaring double standard about alluding to Jewish power in the media. Jews are free to
reference it, but woe unto the non-Jew who wades into those shark-infested waters.
We now have a very
high visibility example of this double standard in action. As reported recently, CNN
anchor Rick Sanchez abruptly
left the network Friday afternoon, just one day after making controversial
comments on a satellite radio program. Rick Sanchez is no longer with the
company, according to a statement from CNN. We thank Rick for his years of
service and we wish him well.
Our editor Kevin MacDonald immediately picked up on this and
commented in a blog called Joe
Sobran was Right on Jewish Media Power:
In my post on Joe Sobran, I included this quote from Joe:
Jewish control of the major media in the media age makes the enforced silence both paradoxical and paralyzing. Survival in public life requires that you know all about it, but never refer to it. A hypocritical etiquette forces us to pretend that the Jews are powerless victims; and if you dont respect their victimhood, theyll destroy you. Its a phenomenal display not of wickedness, really, but of fierce ethnocentrism, a sort of furtive racial superpatriotism.
A current example that illustrates exactly this is the firing of Rick Sanchez from CNN for saying the following about Jews as victims:
[snickers] Hes such a minority, I mean, you know
Please, what are you kidding?
Im telling you that
everybody who runs CNN is a lot like Stewart, and a lot of people who run all the other
networks are a lot like Stewart, and to imply that somehow they the people in this
country who are Jewish are an oppressed minority? Yeah. [sarcastically]
This kind of media development is right up my alley, for my academic specialty is the impact Jews have on American media, especially film. While the firing of Mr. Sanchez is perhaps more high profile than previous instances, it is still part of an all-too-typical pattern.
While Ive long explored how Jews have translated their own concerns into Hollywood and television fare, Ive had to devote a fair amount of time to proving first that Jews in fact have immense power in American media. Among other things Ive written toward this goal are essays in the print journal The Occidental Quarterly. One such essay was "The Jews of Prime Time" where I collected these examples of testimony of Jewish power:
Medved, Orthodox Jew and author of Hollywood vs.
It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish power and prominence
in popular culture . . . Any Martian monitoring American television . . . would view Seinfeld,
Friends, The Nanny, Northern Exposure, Mad about You,
and other shows and be surprised to learn that fewer than 1 in 40 Americans is
Professor Stephen J. Whitfield: From its origins, Hollywood has been stamped with a
Jewish identity, but nobody else was supposed to know about it. But somehow, no matter how
thorough the attempt to suppress or disguise it, Jewishness is going to bob to the surface
Stephen Schiff: The way Steven Spielberg sees the world has become the way the world
is communicated back to us every day.
Gabler, author of An Empire of
Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood,
wrote that The American Dreamis a Jewish invention. As he documented:
The storefront theaters of the late teens were transformed into the movie palaces of
the twenties by Jewish exhibitors. And when sound movies commandeered the industry,
Hollywood was invaded by a battalion of Jewish writers, mostly from the East. The most
powerful talent agencies were run by Jews. Jewish lawyers transacted most of the
industrys business and Jewish doctors ministered to the industrys sick. Above
all, Jews produced the movies.
Because the double standard about revealing Jewish media power was so critical, I devoted a section to it called Denial and Deception Regarding Jewish Power.
Any number of Jewish observers are willing to acknowledge the immense power of Jews in American media, particularly in Hollywood film and television, although this view cannot yet be described as conventional wisdom as far as the general public is concerned. But for informed observers, identity always matters. In Jews and the Left, Arthur Liebman observes that "one of the most important pieces of information a researcher can gather on a social movement is the socioeconomic composition of its membership. The same can be said about the ethnic composition of those openly commenting on Jewish power in the media: they are overwhelmingly Jews themselves.
In contrast, Gentiles are routinely discouraged from noticing, yet alone analyzing, this phenomenon which is crucial in a democracy. As MacDonald notes, Jewish groups have made any critical discussion of Jewish issues off limits, and that's vitally important because, yes, Jews are a very powerful group.
It appears that a regime of silence has been imposed, with ample rewards going to those Gentiles willing to toe the party line and a graduated range of punishments being administered to those unwilling to abide by the established rules of discourse. Prominent examples have been cited by MacDonald et al., including the case of young British journalist William Cash. He is the one who, with innocent candor, noted the Hollywood presence of Michael Ovitz, Steven Spielberg, David Geffen, Jeffrey Katzenberg, Lew Wasserman, Sidney Sheinberg, Barry Diller, Gerald Levin, Herbert Allen and others and wrote of the Spielberg-Geffen-Katzenberg Dream Team: "But in one respect at least this particular combination of talents, or 'talent combo' in the local argot, will start out on the right foot. Like the old mogul founders of the early studios and unlike most other failed build-your-own studio merchants they are Jewish."
I recall how one defender
of this secret, Vincent Brook, author of Something
Aint Kosher Here, attempted to enforce
this silence among non-Jews, applauding the fact that a group critical of some TV
portrayals refrained from reviving the old canard of Jewish media control.
Never mind that Brooks book is all about Jewish prominence in Hollywood.
Brook followed this censure of Cash with a condemnation of Marlon Brando for his unsettling statements on Larry King Live, claiming that Jews run Hollywood and exploit stereotypes of minorities. "Hollywood is run by Jews, it is owned by Jews, but we never saw the kike because they know perfectly well that's where you draw the wagons around."
Two comments about Brandos observation are in order. First, Brando could easily have added White Christians to the list of exploited Hollywood stereotypes, but perhaps his greatest insight was about the kike. Though an unfortunate choice of words, it did point to the fact that we do not begin to see in Hollywood fare even a fraction of the real behavior of real Jews.
The absence of any narrative of Jewish powerpolitical, financial, academicforces us to reconsider David Zurawik's concept of surplus visibility and its application to American media. Zurawik defined the sociological concept of surplus visibility as the feeling among minority members and others that whatever members of that group say or do, it is too much and, moreover, they are being too conspicuous about it. Zurawik accepts the conventional wisdom that membership in a particular community of production will result in less stereotypical images of that community and images more representative of social reality. The paradox he finds is that this is not what happened with Jews and television.
In my view, the Jewish self-censorship exhibited by important gatekeepers of TV programming such as William Paley, David Sarnoff, and Brandon Tartikoff can best be described as a form of deception in which Jewish producers of culture are highly conscious of the perceived interests of the Jewish community. The question Is it good for the Jews? is often uppermost in their thoughts. But almost without exception, these producers of culture refuse to depict Jews as they really are. Instead, the images are created in order to bolster the image of Jews among the goyim.
And yet Jews themselves often fail to see
that the implications of the fact that images of Jews presented in the media are sanitized
for public consumption. Jewish film critic Lester Friedman makes this error even though he
acknowledges that Jews intensely police images of themselves: Unlike films about
other American minorities, movies with Jews were often scrutinized by one segment of that
minority group with the power to decide how the entire group would be presented to society
as a whole. The resulting images of Jews in films constitute a rich and varied tapestry
woven by several generations of moviemakers responding to the world around them.
Of course, this rich and varied tapestry is nothing more than a creative public relations campaign. In the old days, there were formal agreements between the Hollywood studios to subject their films to scrutiny by Jewish organizations.
In An Empire of Their Own, Neal Gabler describes how major Jewish organizations, such as the American Jewish Committee, the ADL, and the American Jewish Congress, developed a formal liaison with the studios by which depictions of Jews would be subjected to censorship. One such group stated in 1947 that Jewish organizations have a clear and rightful interest in making sure that Hollywood films do not present Jews in such a way as to arouse prejudice. . . . In some cases, such pictures should be taken out of production entirely. In other cases, scripts should be edited carefully to eliminate questionable passages. Everything should be done to eliminate unfortunate stereotypes of the Jews. Gabler describes several instances where scripts were altered to provide more positive portrayals of Jews. The activities of this group were not publicized, out of fear that it could result in the charge that [a] Jewish group is trying to censor the industry, which, as Gabler notes, was exactly what it was trying to do (p. 304).
We havent seen realistic visual
portrayals of Jewish power and behavior because Jews in control know that far too many
non-Jews imbibe their sense of reality from the visual media. It would most certainly be
bad for the Jews to show what is actually going on. That is the whole reason for the taboo
against Gentiles noting Jewish media power. I suppose the reason some Jews get away with
it in print is that the audience for most print media is relatively small, so the risks
are smaller, too. Film and TV, on the other hand, broadcast information to millions, if
not tens of millions, at a time.
Here are some more examples of Jews who have discussed Jewish power in the media, from my Understanding Hollywood series.
Film critic Lester D. Friedman: Indeed,
from the very beginnings of the industry until the present, it is impossible to ignore the
influence of Jews on the movie business or to overlook the importance of a Jewish
consciousness in American films.
author of The Jewish Phenomenon: The
Jewish involvement in motion pictures is more than a success story; it is the basis of the
disproportionate influence that Jews have had in shaping American popular culture.
Silbiger again: In
addition to the corporate chieftains, a huge number of Jewish people participate in the
entertainment industry. It has not been part of a grand scheme, but when an ethnic group
becomes as heavily involved, and as successful, in a particular industry as Jewish people
have been in movies, the groups influence, connections and power produce a vast
ripple effect, and other Jewish actors, writers, editors, technicians, directors, and
producers follow in their footsteps.
David Desser and Lester D. Friedman: Regardless
of a Jewish authors past or present involvement with organized religion, current
religious or cultural practices, and personal sense of group attachment or isolation, the
underlying critical assumption is that the work of a Jewish writer must either overtly or
covertly reflect a Jewish sensibility.
In their book Jewtopia: The
Chosen Book for the Chosen People, Bryan Fogel
and Sam Wolfson confirm Jewish dominance in Hollywood, noting that of the ten major
studios under discussion, nine were created by Jews (Walt Disney was a Gentile), and as of
2006 all ten studios were run by Jews. As they concluded: Yes, we do control the
movie studios. All Jews please report to the World Conspiracy Headquarters immediately
(dont forget to bring your pass code). Playwright David Mamet confirmed this
by adding, For those who have not been paying attention, this group [Ashkenazi Jews]
constitutes, and has constituted since its earliest days, the bulk of Americas movie
directors and studio heads.
(Incidentally, Fogel and Wolfson also did
the same for American TV networks, finding a leadership figure of seventy-five percent.
Discussing print media, they found that seven of ten major publications are run by Jews.
Conclusion: Jews have lots of opinions that they love to write about and charge you
money to read! Cool.)
Clearly, Jews are given the freedom to
write about Jewish power if they like. But what would happen if someone who was only
half-Jewish were to do so?
Olivers Stone is a case in point. The Wall Street Journal reported this past summer that Stone said that public opinion was focused on the Holocaust because of Jewish domination of the media. Stone also said that the Jews stay on top of every comment, the most powerful lobby in Washington. Israel has f up United States foreign policy for years.
Like so many others before him, Stone groveled: In trying to make a broader historical point about the range of atrocities the Germans committed against many people, I made a clumsy association about the Holocaust, for which I am sorry and I regret. Jews obviously do not control media or any other industry.
I think that qualifies perfectly as an example of Sobrans paradox on Jewish power and how (not) to refer to it. Perhaps because hes got one foot in the Tribes tent, however, Stones apology was quickly accepted. Said ADL National Director Abraham Foxman. I believe he now understands the issues and where he was wrong, and this puts an end to the matter."
Goyim who violate this rule, though, fair worse. Writing about the recent Rick Sanchez affair, Steve Sailer reminds us how Gregg Easterbrook was punished for his informational transgression. Recall back in 2003 how Easterbrook had written:
Set aside what it says about Hollywood that today even Disney thinks what the public needs is ever-more-graphic depictions of killing the innocent as cool amusement. Disney's CEO, Michael Eisner, is Jewish; the chief of Miramax, Harvey Weinstein, is Jewish. Yes, there are plenty of Christian and other Hollywood executives who worship money above all else, promoting for profit the adulation of violence. Does that make it right for Jewish executives to worship money above all else, by promoting for profit the adulation of violence? Recent European history alone ought to cause Jewish executives to experience second thoughts about glorifying the killing of the helpless as a fun lifestyle choice.
or not, Disney,
the parent of ESPN, fired Easterbrook.
In his blog, MacDonald summed up current
unspoken rules nicely:
So the scenario is exactly as Joe Sobran described it. Deep down you must be fully aware of Jewish power, but public utterances must pledge allegiance to the idea that Jews are powerless victims. Dont mention the fact that a lot of people who run [CNN and] all the other networks are a lot like [Jon] Stewart that they are Jews with immense power, able to shape public discourse on everything of importance. Never mention the obvious fact that Jews are a very large component of the elite in the US and throughout the West. And if you dont go along with the Jews as powerless victims idea, then Jews will destroy you.
victims with the power to destroy their enemies. And thats exactly what
As emphasized here, however, not everyone who calls attention to Jewish media power is fired or forced to grovel. Jews who proudly call attention to Jewish media power get a free pass. And that fact is yet another indication of the enormity of Jewish power in America. http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Connelly-Rick-Sanchez-Jews-Media-Power.html
Edmund Connelly (email him)
is a freelance writer, academic, and
expert on the cinema arts. He has previously written for The
"To Achieve World Government it is necessary to remove from the minds of
men their individualism, their loyalty to family traditions and national
identification" Brock Chisholm -
Director of the World Health Organization
"A society whose citizens refuse to see and investigate the facts, who refuse to believe that their government and their media will routinely lie to them and fabricate a reality contrary to verifiable facts, is a society that chooses and deserves the Police State Dictatorship it's going to get." Ian Williams Goddard
The fact is that "political correctness" is all about creating uniformity. Individualism is one of the biggest obstacles in the way of the New World Order. They want a public that is predictable and conditioned to do as it's told without asking questions.
"The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first." Thomas Jefferson