- Pacific
Hillary Clinton Commits To
UN Small Arms Treaty
Written by Stephen Rhodes on
December 23, 2009
With willing one-world
accomplices in
In fact, Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton just announced the Obama Administration would be working hand in glove
with the UN to pass a new “Small Arms Treaty.”
Disguised as legislation to
help in the fight against “terrorism,” “insurgency” and
“international crime syndicates,” the UN Small Arms Treaty is nothing more than
a massive, GLOBAL gun control scheme.
Ultimately, the UN’s
Small Arms Treaty is designed to register, ban and CONFISCATE firearms owned by private
citizens like YOU.
That’s why it’s
vital you sign special petition I’ve made up for your signature that DEMANDS
your U.S. Senators vote AGAINST ratification of the UN’s “Small Arms
Treaty!”
So far, the gun-grabbers
have successfully kept the exact wording of their new scheme under wraps.
But looking at previous
versions of the UN “Small Arms Treaty,” you and I can get a good idea of
what’s likely in the works.
If passed by the UN and
ratified by the U.S. Senate, the UN “Small Arms Treaty” would almost certainly
FORCE national governments to:
·
Enact
tougher licensing requirements, making law-abiding citizens cut through even more
bureaucratic red tape just to own a firearm legally.
·
CONFISCATE
and DESTROY ALL “unauthorized” civilian firearms (all firearms owned by the
government are excluded, of course)
·
BAN
the trade, sale and private ownership of ALL semi-automatic weapons
·
Create
an INTERNATIONAL gun registry, setting the stage for full-scale gun CONFISCATION.
You see, this is NOT a fight
we can afford to lose.
Ever since it’s
founding almost 65 years ago, the United Nations has been hell-bent on bringing the
To the petty dictators and
one-worlders who control the UN, the
These anti-gun globalists
know that so long as Americans remain free to make our own decisions without being bossed
around by big government bureaucrats, they’ll NEVER be able to seize the worldwide
oppressive power they crave.
And the UN’s apologists
also know the most effective way to finally strip you and me of ALL our freedoms would be
to DESTROY our gun rights.
And you and I know good and
well how
So our ONE AND ONLY CHANCE
of stopping the UN’s “Small Arms Treaty” is during the ratification process
in the U.S. Senate.
As you know, it takes 67
Senate votes to ratify a treaty.
With 40 Republicans, that
should be easy, right?
Unfortunately, that
couldn’t be further from the truth.
First, you know just as well
as I do that not all the remaining Republicans in the Senate are “pro-gun” in
any sense of the term.
Second, even with the
partisan rancor in Washington, D.C., many GOP Senators get “queasy” about
killing treaties for fear of “embarrassing” the President — especially with
“international prestige” at stake.
They look at ratifying
treaties much like approving Presidents’ Supreme Court nominees.
And remember, there were
NINE Republicans who voted to confirm anti-gun Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor.
A dozen more GOP Senators
only voted against Sotomayor after receiving massive grassroots pressure from the folks
back home.
So if we’re going to
defeat the UN’s “Small Arms Treaty” we have to turn the heat up on the U.S.
Senate now before it’s too late!
So won’t you click
here to sign IMMEDIATELY?
http://www.therepublicantemple.com/2009/12/23/hillary-clinton-commits-to-un-small-arms-treaty
The NWOG gun grabbers want all our guns so when they declare martial law we will not be able to defend ourselves.
On June 15, 1995, Norman Olson, along with militia leaders from other states, testified before the Senate Subcommittee on Terrorism. Olson's opening statement included the following:
One other important point needs to be made. Since The Constitution is the limiting document upon the government, the government cannot become greater than the granting power. That is, the servant cannot become greater than its master. Therefore, should the chief executive or the other branch of government or all branches together act to suspend The Constitution under a rule of martial law, all power granted to government would be cancelled and differed back to the granting power. That is the people. And I'll conclude with this statement: Martial law shall NOT be possible in this country as long as the people recognize the bill of rights as inalienable.
Eastern