Iris Scanning Set To Secure City in Mexico, Then the World (video)
The million-plus citizens of Leon, Mexico are
set to become the first example of a city secured through the power of biometric
identification. Iris and face scanning technologies from Global Rainmakers, Inc.
will allow people to use their eyes to prove their identify, withdraw money from an ATM,
get help at a hospital, and even ride the bus. GRIs eye scanning systems arent
more secure than others on the market, but they are faster. Large archway detectors using
infrared imaging can pick out 50 people per minute, even as they hustle by at speeds up to
1.5 meters per second (3.3 mph). The first phase of the Leon iris and face scanning
project has already begun. It is estimated to cost around $5 million and focuses on law
enforcement agencies security check points. Over the next three years commercial
uses will be rolled out with banks leading the charge. Check out the videos below to see
GRIs wide range of iris scanning stations in action. Whether youre jealous or
intimidated by Leons adoption of widespread eye identification you should pay
attention to the project similar biometric checkpoints are coming to locations near
you. Some are already in place.
When it comes to biometric identification, fingerprints are the most widespread and trusted technology. Yet they only contain a few dozen data points to link to your ID. Irises, in contrast, have around 2000 points of reference enough to uniquely identify every person on Earth. Many companies have developed the means to take an iris scan and use these reference points to match them quickly to a database of scans. The problem has typically been that getting the image of the iris itself is slow and requires people to come very close to the scanning device. GRI has focused on improving the iris acquisition side of the technology, increasing the speed and range of their devices. Not only that, but they are bringing the costs down. A 30 person per minute device (the HBox Mini) costs around $48,000. Yet smaller devices, ones suitable for ATMs or desktop computers are falling below $2000. As they become faster and more affordable, the adoption of iris scanners is seemingly becoming more inevitable as well.
Heres a demo of the larger devices from GRI. Notice that masks and sunglasses are
generally not going to deter a scan:
The HBox V provides rapid access to restricted areas for those in cars at a rate around
12 people per minute.
Smaller devices like the EyeSwipe and EyeSwipe Mini could work for secured locations in
an office. According to Fast Company, this scale of iris scanning tech is in
place in Bank of Americas headquarters in Charlotte.
The HCam would provide a means of iris identification for computers and ATMs.
My apologies for showing so many different videos of GRI technology but I wanted to give you an idea of how completely the company has encompassed the application space for iris and face scanning. From large foot trafficked areas, to automobiles, to home use theyve got it covered. They dont have a handheld portable scanner that Ive seen but give them time and theyll probably develop that as well.
This makes me believe GRIs implementation in Leon is eventually going to exceed anything weve seen before. Every other means of access (license, credit card, keys, etc) has the potential of being augmented or replaced by iris and face scanning. Get on a bus, pass security on the way into work, pay for a meal, order packages online all without using anything besides your eye. The Leon project could make this futuristic world appear in just 3 to 5 years. Thats incredible.
We have to put this in a larger context, too. India just launched its enormous effort to digitally identify more than a billion residents using fingerprints, face, and iris scans. Japan already uses finger scans during entry into the country. The EU is working on a variety of passive scanning technologies to help secure airports and other public spaces.
To some these emerging applications must seem like the sign of a privacy apocalypse. Government and commercial institutions will endeavor to create enormous shared databases of biometric data and scan huge numbers of private citizens everywhere they go. The first phase of the project in Leon is going to help track the movements of watch-listed individuals. Rapid scanning face and iris scanning technologies will redefine our sense of privacy in ways that make Big Brother seem like a little sissy.
Jeff Carter, chief business development officer of GRI, didnt make any of this sound less threatening in his interview with Fast Companys Austin Carr:
weve even worked with three-letter agencies on technology that can capture 30-plus feet away. In certain spaces, eventually, youll be able to have maybe one sensor the size of a dime, in the ceiling, and it would acquire all of our irises in motion, at a distance, hundredsprobably thousands as computer power continues to increaseat a time.
If youve been convicted of a crime, in essence, this will act as a digital scarlet letter. If youre a known shoplifter, for example, you wont be able to go into a store without being flagged. For others, boarding a plane will be impossible.
For commercial applications its just as incredible:
Right now, we can determine how many eyeballs are on a Web page. And what you look at and click. For the first time, we can do that in a physical world. If you look at this or that advertisement, and then go purchase the product advertised, we can tie those two things together.
When you get masses of people opting-in, opting out does not help. Opting out actually puts more of a flag on you than just being part of the system. We believe everyone will opt-in.
Does that vision sound ominous to you? It does to me, and Im pretty biometric friendly. Yet Im also fairly cynical. People already have a pretty good handle on my information. Google reads all my emails, albeit in an anonymous way. My bank knows most everything I buy, ditto for credit card companies. As Carter points out, I already deal with these commercial trackers every day. And Ive opted into these systems. I could pay for everything with cash, but I find the convenience of plastic too great to ignore. While Im worried about being verbally assaulted by billboards that try to identify me, theyre going to arrive whether I want them to or not.
Rather than fight the advent of biometrics, Id rather focus on controlling how such data is used. We can pressure governments to insure that people are not unjustly placed on watch-lists. We can require businesses to divorce our identities from collected data to make advertisements anonymous even as they are personalized. We can limit who can use these technologies, and how, even as we accept that they will be widely adopted in the future. Now is the time, as the first cities test the feasibility of biometric ID systems, to ensure that they will be used to benefit rather than restrict the individual. The crucial moment to guide the path of this emergent technology has arrived. Blink and you could miss it. (9.26.2010, Aaron Saenz) http://singularityhub.com/2010/09/26/iris-scanning-set-to-secure-city-in-mexico-then-the-world-video
"To Achieve World
Government it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism,
their loyalty to family traditions and national identification" Brock Chisholm - Director of the World Health Organization
"A society whose citizens refuse to see and investigate the facts, who refuse to believe that their government and their media will routinely lie to them and fabricate a reality contrary to verifiable facts, is a society that chooses and deserves the Police State Dictatorship it's going to get." Ian Williams Goddard
The fact is that "political correctness" is all about creating uniformity. Individualism is one of the biggest obstacles in the way of the New World Order. They want a public that is predictable and conditioned to do as it's told without asking questions.
"The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first." Thomas Jefferson